Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1502

reference
731-tree-1
name
1502
tree-preservation-order

undefined

731-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.988373 50.859638)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.988302 50.859630,-0.988306 50.859644,-0.988315 50.859657,-0.988331 50.859667,-0.988351 50.859673,-0.988373 50.859676,-0.988395 50.859674,-0.988414 50.859667,-0.988430 50.859658,-0.988441 50.859645,-0.988445 50.859631,-0.988441 50.859617,-0.988432 50.859605,-0.988416 50.859595,-0.988396 50.859588,-0.988374 50.859586,-0.988352 50.859588,-0.988333 50.859594,-0.988317 50.859604,-0.988306 50.859616,-0.988302 50.859630)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL